ABOUT CFE223 VS H335

About cfe223 vs h335

About cfe223 vs h335

Blog Article

Thanks Jay. It truly is sounding like I am just likely to have to experiment just a little similar to each individual other load. Hoped to avoid wasting somewhat time with a printed recipie nevertheless the powder makers dont appear to be to love goobering up their superior$$$ exam barrels woth moly.

Quoted: H-335 is usually a common .223 Rem powder and was oft encouraged by ballistician Ed Matunas who did numerous reloading manuals as a powder that shot properly in a number of rifles.  At first a military surplus powder, it's now newly-created for Hodgdon.   Also, mainly because it is often a ball powder, it meters significantly better than extensive-grain IMR 3031.

Horn, I've tried out 50gr. H380 for just a 165gr Hor. awhile back again, fifty two becoming the max. but you truly really have to pack that bullet in there Along with the max load, but I did get very good precision with it, 3/four" @a hundred I believe it had been, from the 700V, but if you do not care about fitting the spherical in the mag.(one shot) seat the bullet about .010' from the lands like I said prior to along with the bullet will not be so packed in there so limited, which I assume truly Do not harm almost nothing, given that it goes in.

Posted: five/3/2016 seven:forty seven:48 AM EDT [#nine] I've been trying CFE223 with some fifty five grain bullets.  Nonetheless working with it.  I'm able to mention that it seems to "feed" pretty much.  I have been making use of my Hornady electronic powder measure/scale though Performing up my loads.  The CFE223 feeds so quickly the powder measure won't be able to precisely meter it (the Digital a single).  It presents me regular above alarms.  Even utilizing the mode button to decelerate the metering greater than placing it in "gradual" would not perform.  I have not tried it while in the regular powder evaluate however but assume It will be incredibly regular. I did, kind of Fortunate truly, operate across an extremely correct BLC2 load a pair selection outings back again.

That is an more mature thread, you might not get a response, and will be reviving an aged thread. You should take into account making a new thread.

Primarily what I'm in search of and doubtless diddn't say it effectively is this. If my max load for normal bullets is forty two gr od H335 then what could my max load be Together with the same powder and moly bullets. Seeking to check apples with apples.

Quoted: I get bored easily. I'm attempting to load up some 55gr plinking loads and Preferably produce a inventory pile. At the moment I am applying CFE223 for my 223 loads.

Accurate, who are owned by Western Powder Co. contact 2520 their "Camp Perry" powder due to its level of popularity amongst Springfield M1A shooters. TAC is a little bit more quickly than 2520 and may be a great match for an AR. In NOSLER's data, once again for bolt guns, TAC did quite effectively. I even have W748 and Varget, but my SP favored the TAC load nicely plenty of to simply call it great and it is now making it himself. He intends to use that load for whitetail.

Quoted: It is attention-grabbing to examine several of the powder expenses for H335 and I'm curious where by Every person is receiving their load data. I've been gradually Doing work up a load h322 for sale utilizing fifty five gr Hornady FMJ BT bullets (I am working with new Winchester brass and Winchester modest rifle primers) and according to my Hornady manual, it lists the min for H335 as twenty.

two grains instead of exceed 3100 fps. The results posted in the guide for an extended barrel do generate better values, however it would appear that the worth of the NATO ammunition in that barrel would produce even larger values.

All you can do would be the load developement & see on your own. All people raves about TAC from the 223, in my guns I only discover it so-so for accruacy w/ certain bullets. You'll find handful of shortcuts to accurate rifle loads. It usually commences w/ the bullet & then anything else is demo & mistake IME.

But it's very clear that Sierra does not publish any strain data plus they do checklist the firearm used for Each individual caliber, providing credence to that tech's e mail.

If offered totally free either the RL550B or maybe the RL650 then I might take the RL550B (my existing push) mainly because it isn't automobile progress. It retains points less complicated, with much less components to are unsuccessful, and I locate the RL550B way more versatile than any car advance progressive....but that is certainly my opinion and yours could vary.

I've been obtaining All those from Midsouth, they'd the most beneficial overall offer on Hornady projectiles but they have different a hundred round sample packs I will probably be hoping out.

Report this page